{"contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}

Newsvine Q&A: John Schoen on your retirement plan

Has the financial market turmoil upended your retirement plans? Looking for ways to get back on track? I'm John Schoen, senior producer for msnbc.com's Business team. Join me for a Q&A session here on Newsvine where we'll look at why so many retirement plans are coming up short - and explore ideas about what can be done to fix the problem. Feel free to post your questions here in advance, and please remember to vote for your favorite questions by clicking the small arrow in each comment box. And check out our special report on retriement, The Cracked Nest Egg.

Any question is fair game, with one caveat: we don't make recommendations about specific investments. (There are plenty of other experts out there who are more than willing to do so.) For those of you visiting us here for the first time, please know that Newsvine is a social news web site designed for members to participate in thoughtful discussions about news-related topics. Feel free to take a look at the Newsvine Code of Honor, it's a short list of standards that existing members hold themselves to here.

{"contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":4113060,"authorDomain":"jim-shr"}

Has anyone addressed the problem imposed on older retirees by the Required Minimum Distribution tax law?  We are being forced to dispose of assets at firesale prices in order to avoid a 50%(!!!) tax on under-withdrawal.  I guess the government needs that 50% to give to AIG and others so their executives can continue enjoying luxury outings aroud the world.

{"commentId":4113060,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jim-shr"}
    Reply#1 - Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:44 PM EST
    {"commentId":4114296,"authorDomain":"cbpotts"}

    Attached to the article about people dipping into their retirement funds to make ends meet was the byline, "Tapping funds is costly," which might lead some to think that it shouldn't be done. My question (comment) is that it would seem to me that paying the penalties and tapping into money that is already ours is less costly than putting the mortgage payment, grocery bills and other day-to-day expenses on credit cards and racking up that kind of debt, which ends up being way more costly in the long term. Am I wrong?

    {"commentId":4114296,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"cbpotts"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:04 PM EST
    {"commentId":4127288,"authorDomain":"HJFJR"}

    I'm not so sure....If you need, say, $2000-3000 imediately, have good credit, and have a credit card where you can borrow at 3.99% until the balance is paid off, you might be beter doing that than cashing out stocks/funds and take a 20-30% loss (if that's what your investments have gone down by).

    {"commentId":4127288,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"HJFJR"}
      #2.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:46 PM EST
      {"commentId":4155013,"authorDomain":"jschoen"}

      As with many questions about personal finance, there are no absolutes. There are just too many variable in each household budget to say there's a "right" or "wrong" choice.

      So you really need to do the math: if the cost of borrowing outside your retirement account exceeds the cost of paying penalties for "early withdrawal" you may be better off using those savings. Over the long term though, you're going to have a much harder time rebuilding those savings.

      Part of the reason penalties were put in place in the first place was to make you think twice about using these savings for retirement. Many readers hate the idea that they have to pay a penalty to access "their own money." What they're overlooking is that the tax advantages these accounts provide are, in effect, government subsidies - something like $80 billion a year, according to one witness at a recent Congressional hearing.

      A lot depends on the immediate circumstances that force you to consider pulling money out of a retirement plan. If you've lost your job and need the money to tide you over to the next one, tapping retirement funds may be the best option. If you're simply falling behind every month and can't keep up with your bills, spending down your savings is not sustainable. The only long-term solution is to cut spending, increase your income - or both.

      So before you tap that savings account, take one more hard look at where the money is going. If you don't have a budget, make one. Before making the difficult choice to withdraw retirement savings, you may be better off making some even harder choices about where you spend your money.

      {"commentId":4155013,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}
        #2.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:35 PM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4115198,"authorDomain":"shado1"}
        ED STRAKERDeleted
        {"commentId":4122170,"authorDomain":"luke-shenoy"}

        Should I wait to rebalance my 401(k), and weight it away from stocks? Should I wait for things to get back to where they were, while still putting contributions into the current plan? Or should I put everything into bonds right away? My portfolio IRA and 401(K) has lost 40% of its value. Thanks.

        {"commentId":4122170,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"luke-shenoy"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#4 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:39 AM EST
        {"commentId":4124206,"authorDomain":"bmitchell"}

        I have the same question.  Advise seems to favor keeping existing 401k stock money in stock so as to not miss an upturn but when does one rebalance?  Like the article, should I wait another 7 years to get back to where I was and then rebalance.  Info on future and current timing of portfolio balancing would be useful.

        Wher are answers posted?

        {"commentId":4124206,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"bmitchell"}
          #4.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:50 AM EST
          {"commentId":4155467,"authorDomain":"jschoen"}

          This is another example of a personal finance question that doesn't come with a one-size-fits all answer. (That's why they call it *personal* finance.)

          In any market, the answer depends heavily on how long you have before you expect to retire.  (Or hope to, at least.) The closer you are, the greater your risk of holding stocks.

          That's why, when it comes to investing for retirement, two people holding the same stocks are exposed to very different levels of risk. I'm 56, my son is 20. His risk is a lot lower than mine because the odds of making money in stocks are much better for someone with a 45-year time horizon than for a some like me with only 10 years left before I may need the money to live on.

          But this is not any market. It's true that if you cash out stocks now, you risk missing the market rebound. Investors who sold into the 1987 stock market crash learned that lesson the hard way. But if you go back a little further in history, the recovery from financial panics was not as abrupt. When the stock market sold off during the Great Depression, it didn't return to its 1929 peak until the mid-1950s.

          So the decision to stay in stocks rests heavily on whether you think this is a "V-shaped" pullback or whether we're in for a longer, more gradual recovery. Given the volatility of this market, it's impossible to predict with any certainty. But it's also hard to come up with a scenario that would provide overnight relief for the widespread problems facing the global economy and financial markets. The risk is that we haven't heard the worst of the bad news yet.

          The central question is whether stocks are priced correctly at current levels or whether they've been wildly oversold. To answer that, you have to know how well the company whose stock you own will weather the ongoing financial storm. Some companies - especially those with lost of cash on their balance sheets and products people will need no matter what happens - may come out of this much stronger. Those stocks have already held up relatively well because people who want to stay in the market have moved money into these safer harbors.

          Lastly, since no one can predict where markets are headed, you have to consider how much market volatility you can take. For some investors, it's better to realize losses now and regroup. Take a look at what's left, figure out where that leaves you and see what it will take to get back on track. If the market comes back to life, you can always get in later. If the market heads lower, you've stopped the bleeding.

          So, if you got a lot of time, you may want to ride this out. But, with apologies to the Coen brothers, this is No Market for Old Men.

          {"commentId":4155467,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}
            #4.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:05 PM EST
            Reply
            {"commentId":4122652,"authorDomain":"kern-vickie"}

            My 401k was rolled into American Funds stocks and I hqve lost $14,000 so far.  Should I move them into a guaranteed 5% annuity until the market begins to go back up or wait it out?  I am 60 and "may" retire when I turn 66.  This is all the lump sum I have retirement.

            {"commentId":4122652,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"kern-vickie"}
              Reply#5 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:13 AM EST
              {"commentId":4122807,"authorDomain":"bbmyls2go"}

              I had to take time off work and ended up having to make a choice to cash out my 401k entirely as I watched 35% of it disappear due to the market downturn.  What are the chances of the govt supporting a change in the 401k rules to suspend the 10% early withdrawal penalty for people like myself who have been slammed by the economic downturn and stock crash and were forced to cash out lest we lose it all? (btw, I would have lost another 15% if I had not cashed out, so I'm ahead of the game in a twisted sort of way).bb.

              {"commentId":4122807,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"bbmyls2go"}
              • 3 votes
              Reply#6 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:21 AM EST
              {"commentId":4125310,"authorDomain":"brian-p-buckmaster"}

              Why are you relying on your 401K now to get you through? Why didn't you put $$ away in savings in addition to contributing to your 401K? What's wrong with you people? You spent most/all of whicvh you make, then whine that "the fat cats" or some secret, shadowy group (aka the Democrats), are manipulating things to get rich while the rest of us are poor...

              I've been saving for years as well as investing and contributing in my 401K and I have a  considerable amount in a self-directed IRA. Yes, on paper, I've lost a ton of $$, but I'm continuing to buy stocks, and will take advantage of a new rule that lets me contribute more into my 401K. The tide will rise and when the market recovers I will be glad I held onto my investments. In the meantime, I'm continuing to pay extra toward my mortgage and put $$ into savings. I can do this - so can you. All you have to do is make some serious lifestyle choices and exercise a little discipline.

              {"commentId":4125310,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"brian-p-buckmaster"}
              • 1 vote
              #6.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:53 PM EST
              {"commentId":4219874,"authorDomain":"bbmyls2go"}

              well, grumps, I don't appreciate your reply since you know nothing of me, my financial situation, or what purposes I have for making the moves I made.  My question was straightforward and your politicizing it adds nothing to the discussion especially since I guess I am not part of "you people" (nice touch) who blames anything on anyone.

              Its nice you have income to spare, real nice, congatulations.  So nice of you to stop in on each comment by those not as rich as you to put them down for being 'unprepared'.  May you never have something you are not prepared for in life happen to you and put you in my shoes.

              {"commentId":4219874,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"bbmyls2go"}
                #6.2 - Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:51 PM EST
                Reply
                {"commentId":4124072,"authorDomain":"bexar2020"}

                I don't mean any disrespect to people who this has happened to, but who in their right mind would retire and leave their nest egg in high risk investments?  I am five years away from retirement, and I have a very large portion of my 401K invested in a fixed income fund that pays a guaranteed 4.5%.  Why?  Because I don't want to postpone my retirement, and the "opportunity lost" (as my former financial advisor calls it) doesn't bother me as much as the thought of having to work another 5-10 years to get my balance back up to the number I need to retire. 

                It's too late now for anybody to take my advice, of course, but anybody who's 55 years old and has just lost 35% of his/her nest egg has just got to look in the mirror if they're looking for somebody to blame.  The Financial Crisis didn't do this to you. You did it to yourself.

                {"commentId":4124072,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"bexar2020"}
                • 4 votes
                Reply#7 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:42 AM EST
                {"commentId":4157318,"authorDomain":"jschoen"}

                This is clearly one of the major lessons learned - the hard way, for too many people. Those with a longer time horizon just got a powerful demonstration of the risks of relying too heavily on stocks as your retirement date approaches.

                In hindsight, it seems obvious. But it's important to remember why so many people overlooked the risk of carrying too much of their savings in stocks too close to retirement.

                For one thing, we've all become conditioned to a powerful, long-term upward trend in the stock market. For most of the past 25 years - the period during which most of today's near-retirees were accumulating their investments - avoiding stocks meant giving up a substantial opportunity to grow a bigger nest egg. Those of us north of 50 also remember the devastating effects of inflation on fixed income investments in the 1970s. As long as inflation remained a threat, stocks provided one of the few ways to protect a portfolio heavy weighted in cash or fixed income investments like bonds. (For the time being, the inflation threat is on the back burner.)

                The recent market crash - there's really no other word to use - also underscores a risk that has been building gradually for decades - one that hasn't come into clear focus until recently. That's the risk we all confronted when company-sponsored "defined benefit" pensions were gradually replaced by individual retirement accounts.

                Under the old system, the money backing our retirement was pooled in one big account and managed full-time by a team of professionals. It may not be rocket science, but managing investments is a skill that some people have and some don't. The more widely that management responsibility is dispersed, the more likely it's going to fall to someone who doesn't have those skills - whether the individual account holder or the "financial adviser" who is selling the investments. 

                It remains to be seen whether the destructoin of trillions of dollars in retirement savings leads to changes in the current system. It's hard to see how we could go back to company-managed defined benefit plans. But last six months have exposed serious flaws in the retirement system we have and derailed millions of retirement plans. 

                So maybe it's time to take a look at other ideas. Anyone have suggestions?

                {"commentId":4157318,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}
                • 1 vote
                #7.1 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:53 PM EST
                Reply
                {"commentId":4124102,"authorDomain":"mepoelzer"}

                I'm  27 years old, employed and curious what the best moves are to start saving for retirment.  Currently I take a cut from each paycheck and put aside in a high yield savings account like Emmigrant Direct.  At some point I would like to start investing, but with todays market I'm apprehensive to do this (at least for now).  Suggestions?

                {"commentId":4124102,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"mepoelzer"}
                • 2 votes
                Reply#8 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:44 AM EST
                {"commentId":4125555,"authorDomain":"tmagney"}

                I am in the exact same situation.  I went out and bought a book, Investing for Dummies.  It didn't give me a road map of how to become rich, but it clarified what my investing options are and the risks involved.  So my advice is to educate yourself first.

                {"commentId":4125555,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"tmagney"}
                  #8.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:07 PM EST
                  {"commentId":4157506,"authorDomain":"jschoen"}

                  Making investment choices can get complicated, but too many people overlook the simplest step - the one you've made getting started at a young age. Not only do you have a long time to weather market ups and downs, you have a huge advantage thanks to the laws of compounding. Every year you wait, substantially reduces the powerful impact of earning more interest next year on the interest you earned this year. It's like free money. 

                  As you begin to move from safer investment like savings accounts, by all means take the time to learn about where you're investing. Most people spend hours researching the purchase of a $1000 flat screen TV set; very few bother to do the research on a $10,000 investment recommended by a financial advisor.

                  Start slow. Think about how much risk you feel comfortable with. Do some research. Remember that higher returns almost always carry higher risk. No one can tell you what the "right" balance is: everyone's different. Stick with it.

                  The great thing about starting early is you can avoid the high-risk, high-return investments you'll need if you start late. A lot of the people who were heavily invested in stocks did so because that was the only way they could hit their savings target in the realtively few years devoted to saving. For the past few deacades, the stock market's higher returns have made it possible to start fairly late and still set aside enough to retire.

                  We won't know for awhile, but those days may be over.

                  {"commentId":4157506,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #8.2 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:04 PM EST
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":4124318,"authorDomain":"litehouse1"}

                  I am like everybody else, hurting for money. I have a 401K but not too much in there to try and get out. But I do have a retirement account from my job of 20 years. 8 years ago and was able to take some out then but now I can not get anymore until I am 55. I am 53 now. I need some of that money NOW, to live on. I know it is for my future but I need to think about now. I had heard President elect Obabma mention something about letting people get their money out early and not have to pay a penaty. He is talking just the 401k or a retirement fund.

                  HELP

                  thanks for your advise

                  {"commentId":4124318,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"litehouse1"}
                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#9 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:56 AM EST
                  {"commentId":4125175,"authorDomain":"brian-p-buckmaster"}

                  Annette, while you we're working for 20 years, why weren't you saving money besides putting in a little into your 401K? The national savings rate has been dismal - hovering at around 1%... It's a tad late, when a crises hits, to be complaining about needing money you don't have.

                  {"commentId":4125175,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"brian-p-buckmaster"}
                    #9.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:46 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4125589,"authorDomain":"nsg"}

                    Once again, the vast majority of us work for small companies that have NO RETIREMENT PLANS and don't make enough to save anything - we live paycheck to paycheck.

                    And the few times I've managed to put a few $$$ away, some crisis hits and its gone  I know very few people who actually have any kind of savings, and I wonder why NO ONE REPORTS ON THIS

                    {"commentId":4125589,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"nsg"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #9.2 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:09 PM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":4124716,"authorDomain":"directories"}

                    poemp you have many years to go before retirement.  If I were you I would speak to a CFP and start buying some of these beaten down stocks.  In 20-30 years, they will be worth much more then they are today.  But stick with large caps that can weather these difficult economic times.  This is truly a great time for the younger investor...

                    {"commentId":4124716,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"directories"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#10 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:19 PM EST
                    {"commentId":4125723,"authorDomain":"biotechatty"}

                    Maybe a blue chip like GM?

                    {"commentId":4125723,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"biotechatty"}
                      #10.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:17 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4127025,"authorDomain":"directories"}

                      As I said:

                      But stick with large caps that can weather these difficult economic times.

                      Certainly GM would not fall into this category!

                      {"commentId":4127025,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"directories"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #10.2 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:32 PM EST
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":4124741,"authorDomain":"rider-83"}

                      Congress created this mess thru deregulation!!  Their pimps told them to deregulated the industry and they did ignoring the concenquences to the people! Therefore congress and the white house should take a 75% pay cut, their retirement should be put into Social security, and they should lose all benefits!!!  Politicians have become nothing more than a bunch of dirty rotten low class prostitutes who serve their pimp lobbyist!! The ones who made out like a bandit is the federal reserve who rip off the American people with the help of the whores of congress and the white house!! Washington D.C no longer represents the people of America they represent their pimps and Israel and just use us and our children to benefit them!!!  The democrats when first elected decided not to prevent bush the B*stard from going into Iran because of it possible impact on Israel, who the f*ck elected them to represent Israel instead of America!!! Israel is NOT our best friend as they have spied on us, stolen our secrets, and attacked us!  They are the only country to us and get away with it in the 60's!  It is the only act of war on the U.S. that congress has never investigated!!!! WHY!!!!!! It is now wrapped up in national security and no one is allowed to discuss it, WHY!!!

                      {"commentId":4124741,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"rider-83"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#11 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:21 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4125108,"authorDomain":"brian-p-buckmaster"}

                      Give me a break rider. you're right that thie mess was facilitated by deregulation, but the main problem is our addiction to spending at and beyond our means. Deregulation, sub-prime loans, etc. all extended economic growth that was unsustainable becuase it depended on people continuing to buy things they couldn't afford. The house of cards was going to fall sooner or later. had it happened soooner it woudn't have been a tough. And we haven't experienced the worst of it yet.

                      {"commentId":4125108,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"brian-p-buckmaster"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#12 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:42 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4125156,"authorDomain":"joycemiam"}

                      We have been very fortunate because we moved almost all of our investments into treasury bonds about 1 year ago and have lost less than 3% of our nest egg since Jan. 08.  I was wondering what percentage we can withdraw annually without using the principle?  My husband says about 3% but I have always heard around 7%?  Given the current economic climate who is closer to the mark?  We are in our mid 50's and intend to keep it in bonds.

                      I would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks

                      {"commentId":4125156,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"joycemiam"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#13 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:45 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4125189,"authorDomain":"roseyg"}

                      Since my 401K account (through my employer) has lost over 40% of its value, I looked into withdrawing the money to get out of debt, invest in a Roth IRA on my own, and start funding a college fund for my son.

                      After reviewing the 10% penalty along with tax withholdings, I was told because I was still an active employee, I could not withdraw my account. Is that really the case? Are there any changes in the tax laws coming that would allow us to tap our 401K balances in order to weather this economic storm?

                      {"commentId":4125189,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"roseyg"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#14 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:46 PM EST
                      {"commentId":4125223,"authorDomain":"chetkantor"}

                      The key is to take control of your own funds. When the economy is obviously going to tank the equity stocks are going down. It does not go in straight lines. It was impossible not to expect the decine so I sold all my equity in company stocks and bought a short fund SKF at 91.00. It is $209.00 today. I am up 110%. The market is going down further and SKF will go higher. Either way I have taken out a lot of profit that I earned on margin and no longer have any margin used.

                      Take control of your own 401K or IRA. I pay $7.00 per trade of any size. You do not need a broker who will charge $$$ for the same trade.

                      {"commentId":4125223,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"chetkantor"}
                        Reply#15 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:48 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4125244,"authorDomain":"altabello-1"}

                        I have money in a retirement account through a previous employer. They asked me to take it out several times, but I never got around to it until the stock market collapse. Now I lost about 60% of it, so I don't want to roll it over now. I'm still under 40, does it make sense to just wait for the market to come back? I'm considering to wait for the market to come back to 2007 levels and then to put my money into a safer investment, so I don't have to worry about it anymore. Is that a good idea? Are there any "safe" investments, that still qualify for the tax deduction?

                        {"commentId":4125244,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"altabello-1"}
                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#16 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:49 PM EST
                        {"commentId":4125510,"authorDomain":"nsg"}

                        Ok, here's my question.

                         

                        What about thoss of us who have no retirement fund or savings? Those of us who have worked 30 years paycheck to paycheck and who have never worked at a company that offered any kind of retirement plan, and could never afford an IRA or anything like it.

                        This is the vast majority of people I know.  Why is there no reporting about us?

                        {"commentId":4125510,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"nsg"}
                          Reply#17 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:05 PM EST
                          {"commentId":4125634,"authorDomain":"kramerforbcc"}

                          What I want to know is why no one is being held accountable for the current financial situation.  Also, that $700 billion is the biggest boon-doggle in the world.  Since when do we reward the very people whose stupidity got us into this mess in the first place. So the hardworkers are going to get screwed.  That is basically it. The CEO's and other overpaid jackasses are going to even receive bonuses while the rest of us watch our 401K's shrink day by day and you can't take the money out or you are punished financially (or have to pay taxes). So far people continue to lose their jobs, their homes, their savings and their retirement while hearings are being held to decide who needs help.  THE CITIZENS need help! All that is happening now is a continuation of the "trickle down" theory which has not and will not work. I predict that we are going to have a depression that will make the last one look like a cakewalk. Isn't there any way to wake up our officials? Geeeez.

                          {"commentId":4125634,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"kramerforbcc"}
                            Reply#18 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:11 PM EST
                            {"commentId":4125647,"authorDomain":"mailxpress11009"}

                            How about the "retired" retirees ?? I'm 76 years old, have worked 49 years and put aside

                            401-K type retirement savings regularly for many years.....only to now realize that Barney

                            Frank's and Chris Dodd's appeared to have deliberately encouraged FANNIE and FREDDIE

                            (their party's mortgage re-packagers and insurers) to put dangerous sub-prime mortgages

                            on the US taxpayers' balance sheet (see WS Journal report on Congressional Hearings with

                            Barney Frank saying even way back SEP 25, 2003 (yes, 5 years ago !):

                            "I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing..."

                            And, in fact, the DEMs on the committee complaint that FREDDIE and FANNIE were not taking

                            on enough  "no-money-down" mortgages from people who "didn't have a pot-to-pee-in".

                            RESULT: $ 225 000.00 of my stock portion of the 401-K have vanished (DOW dropped from

                            14 000 to 8 000 within 1 year). Being handicapped by hips damaged by osteoarthritis......

                            I may not live long enough to wait for the DOW to recover.

                            But my wife at age 71 has to work standing on her feet for 10 hours/day to make ends meet

                            Barney Frank & Co. (taxwriting Congr. Committee) could come-up with a $ 700 Million

                            bail-out package in ten (yes, 10 day)....but they WOULD NOT STOP THE SUB-PRIME TSUNAMI

                            (SUB-PRIME MELT-DOWN) in the almost 2 years they have had the power of the law.

                            Mr. A. Falcon Jr, the director of OFHEO (US Govt housing oversight/regulator) who pleaded

                            with the Committee 5 years ago:

                            "I have been asking for additional authorities and resources !"

                            which fell on the Committees "deaf ears".

                            Details: GoTo:             

                            Look for: Barney Frank - Fannie - Fannie Mayhem -

                            {"commentId":4125647,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"mailxpress11009"}
                              Reply#19 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:12 PM EST
                              {"commentId":4127287,"authorDomain":"directories"}

                              Quit tossing the blame on Barny Frank and Chris Dodd.  Republicans controled the Presidency, House, and Senate for 6 of the last 8 years.  If Republicans did not like how Fannie and Freddie were dishing out money, they certainly had enough control and time to change it.  Republican ignorance certainly does not clean their hands from this mess.  In fact, the Republicans sat back and watched it happen.

                              If you want to assign blame to anyone, look to the dimwit that is sitting in the Whitehouse now.  He's about the worst President this nation has ever seen...

                              {"commentId":4127287,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"directories"}
                                #19.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:46 PM EST
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":4125663,"authorDomain":"biotechatty"}

                                Wouldn't it have made sense to borrow half of my 401K when the market was still above 12,000? 

                                {"commentId":4125663,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"biotechatty"}
                                  Reply#20 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:13 PM EST
                                  {"commentId":4125691,"authorDomain":"kramerforbcc"}

                                  I think all of the citizens of this country need to raise their voices and not ask but DEMAND that the CEO's, mortgage brokers, bankers and others who are responsible for the current financial cesspool have to pay the price. This is like Enron on a larger scale (no one was really held responsible in that one either). There needs to be some serious prison time served by some of these. Instead it is just business as usual while they wait for their Christmas bonus (of millions).  This is BS. Come on, people. Make your voices heard. This is not right and we just won't stand for it!!!!

                                  {"commentId":4125691,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"kramerforbcc"}
                                    Reply#21 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:15 PM EST
                                    {"commentId":4125897,"authorDomain":"ewinters"}

                                    What no-one mentions are the folks (like me), over 71 1/2 - and FORCED to take money out of IRA's at an absurd time!

                                    {"commentId":4125897,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"ewinters"}
                                      Reply#22 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:26 PM EST
                                      {"commentId":4126599,"authorDomain":"msjudy-1"}

                                      I hear you, I also have to take from my IRA this year..............what a bummer!!!!!!!!!!!

                                      {"commentId":4126599,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"msjudy-1"}
                                        #22.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:07 PM EST
                                        {"commentId":4140401,"authorDomain":"fabsnh"}

                                        My dad was a laborer and paid into a union annuity. He is now 71 and has to withdraw from his fund. He will receive less than half by the time taxes and losses are accounted for. He worked hard for that money and did without to contribute to it. What is congress going to do for people like him?  Bailing out the banks and auto industry isn't going to help people of his age group, nor will waiting for the market to turn around.

                                        {"commentId":4140401,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"fabsnh"}
                                          #22.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:14 PM EST
                                          Reply
                                          {"commentId":4126607,"authorDomain":"smercer"}

                                          I am a 50 year-old African-American woman who was diagnosed with Stage IV Breast cancer in 2006.  I have lost closed to 40,000 in my Retirement Fund (AIG).  I know I may not have long to live but I still get up and go to work everyday, primarily so that I will have health insurance.  My co-payments are literally bankrupting me, but I do what I have to do.  I had planned on taking an early retirement so that I could live out the remainder of my years with at least some dignity.  Our economy is such that the little money I have left in my retirement account, plus some other retirement matching funds from my current employer and a little from Social Security, make it impossible for me to financially live for another year with working.  I am still undergoing Chemotherapy treatments on a weekly basis.  I have to pay for parking at the hospital at a rate of $16.00.  I have to pay for parking near my employment at a rate of $12.00.  I have to purchase meds and special foods for my disease.  I am not complaining because I know there are people who are worse off than I.  But, what can I do to financially live a life of dignity and relaxation.  I'd like a bail-out as well.

                                          {"commentId":4126607,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"smercer"}
                                          • 2 votes
                                          Reply#23 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:07 PM EST
                                          {"commentId":4131023,"authorDomain":"kekenn"}

                                          Shawn,  I'm truly sorry to hear of your medical and financial problems.  I very much hope it works out for you and would only encourage you to never loose faith...it is really the only thing we can all rely upon.  Keep moving forward, never give up, and may God always bless you. 

                                          {"commentId":4131023,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"kekenn"}
                                            #23.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:03 PM EST
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":4126667,"authorDomain":"mailxpress11009"}

                                            I'll make it short.

                                            The problem started under Jimmy Carter's 1977 to 1981 presidency with the COMMUNITY RE-INVESTMENT LAW that would force bankers to make mortgage loans to undeserving buyers, i.e. they had no or too low FICO rating.

                                            The Democratic party started COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS in the slums of big cities that were financed by MILLION-DOLLAR "donations" from the National Mortgage Bank (started by the democrat ==== Franklin Delano Roosevelt ======= more than 40 years ago, aka FANNIE MAE, now in Washington DC, staffed by "out-of-office" Democratic Leaders in high (CEO) positions, like FRANKLIN RAINES, one-time CEO of Fannie Mae who was found, along with others to have COOKED-THE-BOOKS (Enron-style), for which he was fined Millions of $$$$ but did not have to pay a nickel because Fannie had bought "insurance" (from AIG ??? ha-ha-ha) that paid the fine to the SEC. Another $ 400 Million fine was paid by Fannie, also to the SEC. The good Democrat soldier FRANKLIN RAINES (an A-A) was duly rewarded with a 2-digit-Million $$$ GOLDEN HANDSHAKE by his Fannie-Mae employer while dismissed.

                                            The donations the Community received from "well-wishers" (many came from Fannie and the sister Freddie-Mac) enabled them to hire "community organizers" in groups like ACORN (where our new fearless leader OBAMA cut his political teeth in South Chicago and started his political career, building a power base to get elected to the Illinois State House and later to the US Congress). Typically, they would get people in, like South Chicago, and find a small house for them, get them a sub-prime-mortgage and then take them to the Chicago VOTER REGISTRATION OFFICE, where they were recorded as NEWLY MINTED DEMONCRATS. Over the years, Millions of new DEMOCRATS, especially the last 4 years, were added to the DEMOCRATS voter rolls in big cities nationwide.

                                            Is it any wonder that our new fearless leader OBAMA was elected with, I believe I heard, 96 or 97 per cent of the BLACK vote =

                                            nationwide it was 63 Million for OBAMA votes vs. 56 Million against OBAMA, i.e. a 7 Million votes difference...most of those coming from newly-minted, overwhelmingly black DEMOCRAT voters.

                                            That's one of the explanations why the DEMOCRATS in Congress fiercely defended the costly and risky "buying & insuring" bad mortgages before re-selling them to Wall Street who, in turn, re-sold them to investors world-wide.

                                            When the "house-of-cards" came crashing down and LEHMAN Brothers of Wall Street went under.....all hell broke loose and most everybody asked:      WHODUNNIT ??? 

                                            The fault clearly lies with the DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP in the US Congress who were in charge of making new laws and regulation to put a stop to the irresponsible "insurances by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac" on behalf of the US taxpayer, but who refused to do so.

                                            Like the famous Washington Redskins' coach VINCE LOMBARDIE announced to the world.....

                                            WINNING IS NOT EVERYTHING......IT'S THE   O N L Y   THING.

                                            The Democratic Party of the USA got that one planned for years, and it paid off on Nov 4,  08

                                            The price paid by the US economy (and the American people) and that of the industrialized world is so huge it cannot be clearly measured: TRILLION upon TRILLION of Dollars & Euros.

                                            The POLs don't care! Get over it!

                                            Or have you seen Barney Frank and/or Chris Dodd step-up to the mikes and cameras yet ??

                                            {"commentId":4126667,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"mailxpress11009"}
                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#24 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:11 PM EST
                                            {"commentId":4126958,"authorDomain":"raincitypeople"}

                                            Wow, you hit it right on the head.  I love a rant like this.  As far as I know, you are 110 percent correct.  With your kind permission I'll use some of your comments when arguing with some of my lefty associates.  I live in the bluest of blue areas in the country just outside the Seattle area.  Come political season my poor little Republican yard signs look pretty lonely on our street.

                                            Thanks again;

                                            Don

                                             

                                             

                                            {"commentId":4126958,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"raincitypeople"}
                                              #24.1 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:29 PM EST
                                              {"commentId":4138716,"authorDomain":"thomas-nelson"}

                                              How pathetic to blame this on Carter!  The fact is, the law was changed to prevent redlining; people still had to demonstrate credit-worthiness, they just could not be denied a loan based on their address.  This is the result of massive, irresponsible deregulation.  When the SEC allows firms to carry 30:1 ratios, they effectively have eliminated the safety net of forcing firms to carry  reserves for protection.  That is where things broke down!  90% or more of the bad loans were made to middle and upper class people, not poor blacks! 

                                              {"commentId":4138716,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"thomas-nelson"}
                                                #24.2 - Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:19 AM EST
                                                {"commentId":4157703,"authorDomain":"jschoen"}

                                                We try to keep itnon-partisan at the Answer Desk, but it's pretty clear there were a number of causes for the lending spree that gave us the housing bust at the root of the collapse of the financial markets. 

                                                The current Treasury Secretary, for example, is among those who now acknowledge that the regulatory structure that was in place when the lending industry jumped the rails was outdated and inadequate. Both borrowers and lenders ignored risk. The mortgage lending system was permeated by fraud - of varying degrees at various levels. And the global financial system failed to adequately assess - and price - the risk that was building up in the system as borrowing expanded everywhere: consumers, businesses, investment funds, government, etc.

                                                When the borrowing stopped, if left behind a huge debt hole that we're all now trying to figure out how to fill. It's going to take awhile to do so.

                                                {"commentId":4157703,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"jschoen"}
                                                • 2 votes
                                                #24.3 - Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:16 PM EST
                                                Reply
                                                {"commentId":4126859,"authorDomain":"mjcrew9"}

                                                I think you people crying about your retirement shrinking should quit your crying, you allow the crooks calling themselfs our leaders to create their own retirement program that gives them there pay, which is up around 180,000 a year, even if they are only in for 3 or 4 years and they make you contribute to a social security program that they could never by law make mandatory which is shrinking every year because they keep borrowing from it, they let bank CEO's squander away billions and get million dollar bouness and say they can bail these CEO's out with your money, where did the constitution say they could do that.

                                                Quit your crying and get off your tail end and do something, enough is enough, both Democrats and Republicans will continue to do what they are doing untill you do something, Like getting rid of the Federal Reserve and getting back to sound money, money backed by something, if the money was backed bu Gold and Silver again, they could only spend what they had backing it, no more, Wake up people.

                                                {"commentId":4126859,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"mjcrew9"}
                                                  Reply#25 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:22 PM EST
                                                  {"commentId":4127099,"authorDomain":"donjoni1"}

                                                  Hi,

                                                  When will the Fed pony up a bail out package for all us baby boomers that have seen their 401k evaporate into green air??

                                                  {"commentId":4127099,"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041","authorDomain":"donjoni1"}
                                                    Reply#26 - Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:36 PM EST
                                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"422548","isPrivate":false}
                                                    Leave a Comment:
                                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                    {"threadId":"422548","contentId":"2125041"}
                                                    Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                    Stop TrackingStop Tracking
                                                    John Schoen's Latest Comments
                                                    John Schoen's Recent Votes
                                                    John Schoen has not voted for any articles or seeds yet.
                                                    Comments & Feedback
                                                    – Show More